repair manual cars
LINK 1 ENTER SITE >>> Download PDF
LINK 2 ENTER SITE >>> Download PDF
File Name:repair manual cars.pdf
Size: 2005 KB
Type: PDF, ePub, eBook
Category: Book
Uploaded: 28 May 2019, 23:17 PM
Rating: 4.6/5 from 758 votes.
Status: AVAILABLE
Last checked: 19 Minutes ago!
In order to read or download repair manual cars ebook, you need to create a FREE account.
eBook includes PDF, ePub and Kindle version
✔ Register a free 1 month Trial Account.
✔ Download as many books as you like (Personal use)
✔ Cancel the membership at any time if not satisfied.
✔ Join Over 80000 Happy Readers
repair manual carsPlease try again.Please try again.Please try again. The variety of environments people encounter present complex skill and safety challenges to wheelchair users and their helpers. Unfortunately, many people are not properly trained in the safe and efficient use of their wheelchairs, which may result in falls and serious injury to wheelchair users and their assistants. This book was designed to be used by wheelchair users, their families, friends, caregivers, and anyone else who might need comprehensive information about manual wheelchair skills. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Full content visible, double tap to read brief content. Videos Help others learn more about this product by uploading a video. Upload video To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness. Please try again later. JudyK45 5.0 out of 5 stars They don't around my area (Mid-Hudson Valley)! Unfortunately, manyThis book was designed to be used by wheelchair users, their families, friends, caregivers, and anyone else who might need comprehensive information about manual wheelchair skills. This manual is also very useful to rehabilitation professionals training wheelchair users in wheelchair mobility skills. The illustrated instructions provide guidance for wheelchair users on how to negotiate indoor environments, obstacles, and outdoor terrain. General hints to prepare for traveling, emergencies, and other situations are also included. In addition, the training guide provides instructions on how to assist someone with a technique and describes the progressions for learning new maneuvers.http://fire-matic.com/testingsites/advantage_aviation/assets/media/dance-music-manual-tools-toys-and-techniques-download.xml
- Tags:
- repair manual cars, service manual cars, service manual cars free download, workshop manual cars, maintenance manual cars, repair manual for cars free download, british repair manual cars, repair manuals for cars free, repair manual cars, repair manual car, repair manual craftsman lawn tractor, repair manual craftsman 247.290003, repair manual can opener, repair manuals, repair manuals online free, repair manuals online, repair manuals free, repair manual car.
The principles discussed will help readers learn good riding and assisting habits applicable to any mobility skillsThe skills and information in this guide will hopefully help increase the independence of wheelchair users, decrease the number of wheelchair accidents caused by the lack of education and training, and limit the frustration caused by those receiving or giving assistance. The wheelchair skills andThese experienced individuals provided input on the wheelchair techniques, text content, and illustrations. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Full content visible, double tap to read brief content. Groups Discussions Quotes Ask the Author To see what your friends thought of this book,This book is not yet featured on Listopia.While hands on help would also be appreciated, the diagrams and tips in here are a lot more help than me just guessing in some cases. I need WAY more practice. This book might help me feel comfortable with doors and intersections instead of getting up and walking Esme, my wheelchair, through them as I’m doing now. I’m interested to see the 2013 edition to see what they mi While hands on help would also be appreciated, the diagrams and tips in here are a lot more help than me just guessing in some cases. I’m interested to see the 2013 edition to see what they might have added as well- this copy was an inter library loan. There are no discussion topics on this book yet.We've got you covered with the buzziest new releases of the day. People in developing countries often depend on the donation of wheelchairs, which are frequently of poor quality and not suitable either for the users or their environment. Health and rehabilitation professionals are not always trained adequately to ensure people with disabilities have a quality wheelchair. Towards this, WHO is posting the whole training package in the Website for the training institutes and wheelchair service providers.http://clubselectionvoyages.com/images/3rd-1999-edition-of-the-sadc-road-traffic-signs-manual.xml The easiest way to make use of the training package is to download the complete package (requires 3 GB space). Then click the “Timetable and sessions” tab to open the timetable. Click the hyperlinks of each session, which lead you to the exact slides and video location. The best way to deliver the training is to proceed through the lessons in sequential order respecting the timing allotted for each session as much as possible. WHO would be happy to receive your feedback about this training package in order to make future improvements. Download one of the Free Kindle apps to start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, and computer. Please try again.The variety of environments people encounter present complex skill and safety challenges to wheelchair users and their helpers. This book was designed to be used by wheelchair users, their families, friends, caregivers, and anyone else who might need comprehensive information about manual wheelchair skills. To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness. They don't around my area (Mid-Hudson Valley)! Groups Discussions Quotes Ask the Author The many kinds of environments people encounter daily present complex skill and safety challenges to wheelchair riders and their helpers. Unfortunately, many people have not been properly trained in the safe and efficient use of th The many kinds of environments people encounter daily present complex skill and safety challenges to wheelchair riders and their helpers. Unfortunately, many people have not been properly trained in the safe and efficient use of their wheelchairs. Improper skills commonly result in falls and serious injury to wheelchair riders and their assistants. This book was designed to be used by wheelchair users, their families, friends, caregivers and anyone else who might need comprehensive information about powered wheelchair skills.http://dev.pb-adcon.de/node/25965 In addition, this training guide provides instructions on how to assist someone with a technique and describes the progressions for learning new maneuvers. The principles discussed will help readers learn good wheelchair riding and assisting habits, which are applicable to any mobility skills they might develop in the future. The skills and information in this guide will hopefully help increase the independence of wheelchair users, decrease the number of wheelchair accidents caused by the lack of education and training, and limit the frustration caused by those receiving or giving inadequate or improper assistance. The wheelchair skills and instructions in this book were compiled with the assistance of wheelchair users and rehabilitation professionals. These experienced individuals provided input on the wheelchair techniques, text content, and illustrations. To see what your friends thought of this book,This book is not yet featured on Listopia.There are no discussion topics on this book yet.We've got you covered with the buzziest new releases of the day. Please complete our short feedback survey after watching a video. Thank you. They talk about the changes they've noticed over time and what they are doing to stay as healthy and independent as possible as they age. He talks with Dr. Jeanne Hoffman about his life, aging, and staying healthy after more than three decades in a wheelchair. He talks to psychologist Jeanne Hoffman about his life as an independent, successful businessman and how he is adjusting to aging with a spinal cord injury. These short videos will show you how. Spinal Cord. 2010;48:319-399. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:2316-2123. Learning to perform wheelchair wheelies: comparison of 2 training strategies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:785-793. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:475-479. Wheelchair Skills Training Program for clinicians: a randomized controlled trial with occupational therapy students. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:1160-1170. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005;42:65-74. Effect of a high-rolling-resistance training method on the success rate and time required to learn the wheelchair wheelie skill. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;87:204-211. Disabil Rehabil: Assistive Technology. 2006;1:119-127. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89:2342-2348. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77:1266-1270. The effect of rolling resistance on stationary wheelchair wheelies. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;85:899-907. Curb descent testing of suspension manual wheelchairs. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45:73-84. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:41-50. Dalhousie University. Available at:. Accessed September 18. 2010. Pushrim biomechanics and injury prevention in spinal cord injury: Recommendations based on CULP-SCI investigations. J Rehabil Res Propulsion patterns and pushrim biomechanics in manual wheelchair propulsion. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(5):718-723. Accessed June 27, 2016. Seating and wheelchair prescription. In: Field-Fote EC, ed. Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation. Philadelphia, PA: F A Davis Company; 2009: 161-210. Wheelchair configuration and postural alignment in persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84(4):528-534. NW Regional SCI System Forum. Available at Presented April 9,2013. Accessed June 27, 2016. Paralyzed Living. YouTube.. Published May 27, 2014. Accessed June 27, 2016. Redefining the manual wheelchair stroke cycle: Identification and impact of nonpropulsive pushrim contact. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90(1):20-26. The ergonomics of wheelchair configuration for optimal performance in the wheelchair court sports. Sports Med. 2013;43(1):23-38. Effects of wheel and hand-rim size on submaximal propulsion in wheelchair athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44(1):126-134. A new design for an old concept of wheelchair pushrim.Arlington, VA: Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology Society of North America; 2012. Available at:. Accessed March 29, 2016. Reduced finger and wrist flexor activity during propulsion with a new flexible handrim.J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49(1):63-74. Available at:. Accessed: April 2, 2016. The effect of wheelchair handrim tube diameter on propulsion efficiency and force application (tube diameter and efficiency in wheelchairs).J Rehabil Med. 2009;41(3):143-149. Assistive technology devices for toileting and showering used in spinal cord injury rehabilitation - a comment on terminology. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2014:1-2. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013;8(4):267-274. Development, construction, and content validation of a questionnaire to test mobile shower commode usability. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2015;21(1):77-86. Use, performance and features of mobile shower commodes: Perspectives of adults with spinal cord injury and expert clinicians. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015;10(1):38-45. Does upper-limb muscular demand differ between preferred and nonpreferred sitting pivot transfer directions in individuals with a spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2009;46(9):1099-1108. Clin Biomech. 2008;23(3):279-290. Medbridge website.. Accessed November 28, 2016. Ultrasonographic median nerve changes after repeated wheelchair transfers in persons with paraplegia and their relationship with subject characteristics and transfer skills. PM R. 2016;8(4):305-313. Upper limb joint kinetics of three sitting pivot wheelchair transfer techniques in individuals with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2015;38(4):485-497. Upper limb kinetic analysis of three sitting pivot wheelchair transfer techniques. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2011;26(9):923-929. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2012;7(1):20-29. Transfer component skill deficit rates among Veterans who use wheelchairs. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2016;53(2):279-294. Design of the advanced commode-shower chair for spinal cord-injured individuals. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2000;37(3):373-382. The impact of transfer setup on the performance of independent wheelchair transfers. Hum Factors. 2013;55(3):567-580. Immediate biomechanical implications of transfer component skills training on independent wheelchair transfers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97(10):1785-1792. The relationship between independent transfer skills and upper limb kinetics in wheelchair users. Biomed Res Int. 2014:1-12. Learn More. Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada Find articles by R. Lee Kirby Doug Mitchell 2. Charlie Norwood Veterans Administration Medical Center, Augusta, Georgia, United States of America Find articles by Doug Mitchell Sunil Sabharwal 3. Veterans Administration Boston Health Care System and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America Find articles by Sunil Sabharwal Mark McCranie 4. Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada 2. Charlie Norwood Veterans Administration Medical Center, Augusta, Georgia, United States of America 3. Veterans Administration Boston Health Care System and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America 4. Conceptualization: ALN RLK DM SS MM. Data curation: MM. Formal analysis: MM RLK. Funding acquisition: ALN RLK DM SS. Investigation: DM SS ALN. Methodology: ALN RLK DM SS MM. Project administration: ALN DM SS. Resources: ALN DM SS. Supervision: ALN DM SS. Copyright notice This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC. Associated Data Supplementary Materials S1 File: CONSORT checklist. (PDF) pone.0168330.s001.pdf (135K) GUID: 66C33AB8-021D-4FD2-AA14-44320F015EF6 S2 File: Trial protocol. (PDF) pone.0168330.s002.pdf (506K) GUID: 186BE8B4-E989-4276-9DA8-4643DD089878 Data Availability Statement There are restrictions prohibiting the authors from making the minimal dataset publicly available. Veterans Affairs is in the process of determining policy and procedures for publically sharing data. Until that time, Veterans Affairs investigators are prohibited from publically releasing data. Abstract Objectives To test the hypotheses that community-dwelling veterans with spinal cord injury (SCI) who receive the Wheelchair Skills Training Program (WSTP) in their own environments significantly improve their manual wheelchair-skills capacity, retain those improvements at one year and improve participation in comparison with an Educational Control (EC) group. Methods We carried out a randomized controlled trial, studying 106 veterans with SCI from three Veterans Affairs rehabilitation centers. The main outcome measures were the total and subtotal percentage capacity scores from the Wheelchair Skills Test 4.1 (WST) and Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique (CHART) scores. Results Participants in the WSTP group improved their total and Advanced-level WST scores by 7.1 and 30.1 relative to baseline (p Conclusions Individualized wheelchair skills training in the home environment substantially improves the advanced and total wheelchair skills capacity of experienced community-dwelling veterans with SCI but has only a small impact on participation. However, there are a number of problems associated with their use. One way to enhance the benefits and minimize the problems of wheelchair use is better wheelchair provision. One of these steps is the training of wheelchair users in the use and care of their wheelchairs. The WSTP is a set of training protocols that combines the best available evidence on motor-skills learning with the best evidence on how to perform specific wheelchair skills. Our primary objective was to test the hypothesis that community-dwelling veterans with SCI who receive the WSTP in their own environments significantly improve their manual wheelchair-skills capacity in comparison with an Educational Control (EC) group. Our secondary objectives were to describe differences in the success rates for individual skills, to test the hypothesis that any improvements would be retained at one year, and to test the hypothesis that such training has an impact on participation. Materials and Methods Participants We studied community-dwelling veterans with SCI who used manual wheelchairs, a sample of convenience. We oversampled, in anticipation of drop-outs between the baseline and post-training assessments. Study Design An un-blinded RCT design was used for this multi-site study. CONSORT guidelines were followed ( Fig 1 ) (see S1 File ). Open in a separate window Fig 1 CONSORT flow diagram. This diagram illustrates the numbers of charts reviewed, the number of participants enrolled, allocated to each group and assessed at baseline (T1), after training (T2) and at one-year follow-up (T3). The original protocol can be viewed in S2 File. There are restrictions prohibiting the authors from making the minimal dataset publicly available. Sites The three sites were the James A. Haley Veterans’ Hospital in Tampa, Florida, the Charlie Norwood Veterans Administration (VA) Medical Center in Augusta, Georgia and the West Roxbury campus of the VA Boston Healthcare System in Boston, Massachusetts. Recruitment and Screening Participants were recruited by recruitment flyers, word of mouth and review of health records for individuals who met eligibility criteria. Potential participants who met initial criteria were mailed letters informing them of the study and asking any interested individuals to contact the study coordinator for additional information. To ensure the privacy of potential participants, no identifying information was utilized until the participants provided consent to participate in the study. Potential participants were excluded if they had a progressive disease, had a cardiac or respiratory condition that limited physical performance, had any unstable medical conditions or were pregnant. Demographic and Clinical Data To describe the sample, we collected demographic and clinical data at intake by chart review and interview. Wheelchair Data Participants used the wheelchairs that they ordinarily used. No alterations were made by study personnel to optimize fit or function. Wheelchair specifications were recorded at T1. Group Allocation Participants were randomly assigned to either the WSTP or EC groups by using a computer-generated blocked randomization schedule. This was done to ensure that at no time during randomization was the imbalance large and that at certain points the number of participants in each group would be equal. At the end of baseline data collection, each participant was handed a sealed envelope that had the study-group assignment and the schedule for skills training or education. Participants each received five one-on-one training sessions. The trainers (all of whom were therapists or therapy assistants) were trained in WSTP administration. Wheelchair skills trainers familiarized themselves with the WSP website and received in-person practical training from the WSP developers. For any research personnel who joined the study later, the outgoing person and research coordinator at that site trained the incoming person. The individuals shown in these figures have given written informed consent (as outlined in the PLOS consent form) to publish these photographs. Examples of training goals that fell outside the WSTP skill set were use of a customized vehicle lift system and transfer into a pool. During training, whenever possible, a significant other or caregiver was present, to increase the likelihood of safe practice between the formal training sessions. Open in a separate window Fig 2 Example of wheelchair skill. The “ascends 5 cm level change” skill shown during the caster-popping phase. Open in a separate window Fig 4 Example of wheelchair skill. The “descends stairs” skill using one of the options for hand positioning. Open in a separate window Fig 3 Example of wheelchair skill. The “stationary wheelie” skill being practiced on a soft surface before progressing to a smooth level surface. Education Control The EC intervention mirrored the WSTP in intensity, duration and process. The difference was in the content. Participants in the EC group received five home-based sessions about 45 minutes in duration that focused on health promotion for persons with SCI. The EC participants each had discussion with a research assistant (usually a nurse who worked on the SCI unit) on the topics related to general wellness after SCI, including nutrition, pressure ulcer prevention, prevention of infections, prevention of respiratory complications and the importance of exercise. Education Control trainers received training from the research coordinators at each site. The material covered in the sessions was part of standard care for people with SCI and the research personnel were already well-versed in the content. Using principles of adult learning, each session began with an informal pre-test. The same Fact Sheets were used at all sites and with all participants. Examples of the content of such sessions were the importance of maintaining strength and range of motion for health and function and the importance of frequent weight relief from the buttocks as a means of preventing pressure ulcers. The sessions were individualized based on the pre-test and the specific health issues of the participant. During training, whenever possible, a significant other or caregiver was present. The session ended with an informal post-test and the participant received printed materials to keep. The WSTs for this study were carried out either in participants’ homes or the study hospitals. The total WST capacity score was the percentage of skills that were passed. Subtotal scores for the Indoor, Community and Advanced level skills were also computed. The CHART is a general measure of participation that captures the interaction of the person and the environment, community reintegration and participation. The CHART quantifies handicap by evaluating six domains: cognitive independence, economic self-sufficiency, mobility, occupation, physical independence and social integration. Each of the six subscales has a maximum score of 100, and the subscale scores were summed to form a total score (maximum of 600). High scores indicate lesser restriction in participation. Participants’ Perceptions We recorded any of the participants’ spontaneous comments that were of relevance to the training intervention. Procedure The enrollment process consisted of having interested individuals contact the site project manager who verified eligibility criteria, answered any study-related questions and obtained contact information in order for research staff members to schedule an initial visit. During the initial visit, the research staff verified eligibility criteria, obtained informed consent and collected demographic, clinical and wheelchair data. The participants were randomized to the WSTP or EC group. Participants were provided with either wheelchair-skills training or education in their own environments over a 5-week period. Scheduled phone calls every two months between T2 and T3 were used as a strategy to increase subject retention. Data Analysis Teleforms (TeleForm v 10. Demographic, clinical and wheelchair data were reported descriptively for the T1 time point, comparing the two groups to assess comparability using Chi square for categorical data and two-sample t tests for continuous data. Two-sample t tests were used to compare the T1-T2 and T2-T3 latencies (in days) of the two groups. To assess whether there was a training effect due to the WSTP intervention, we used two-tailed, two-sample t tests to compare the groups’ change scores (T2-T1), initially using only data from the participants who completed the study. For these analyses, we looked at total and subtotal (Indoor, Community and Advanced levels) WST scores and total and subscale CHART scores. Additionally, we used repeated measurement Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) to assess the interaction between group and time and multivariate models that included the baseline demographic and clinical variables. We assessed the effect of drop-outs by comparing the demographic and clinical characteristics of drop-outs with those who completed the study (using Fisher test for categorical variables and t tests for continuous variables) and by conducting Intention to Treat (ITT) analyses on the WST outcome variables. For the two ITT analyses, we replaced missing values with either the previous value or the mean value for that group at that time point. To assess whether there was retention, we used paired t tests to evaluate the WSTP group with respect to the total and subtotal WST change scores (T3-T2). For each of the individual skills, we calculated the n () of participants in each group who were successful at each time point. In Table 1 are shown the demographic and clinical data at T1 for the 106 participants who enrolled in the study. The two groups were comparable with respect to the parameters shown. The average age of participants was in the late 40s, there was a very high predominance of males and over two-thirds of participants in both groups had SCIs at the thoracic level. The mean duration of the SCIs in both groups was over 15 years. The median number of comorbidities was low. About three-quarters of participants had completed at least four years of college education and about one-third were employed. About half were married or partnered and over three-quarters were white. About one-half of participants were from the Tampa site and the others were about equally divided between the Boston and Augusta sites.Wheelchair Data The wheelchair specifications at T1 are shown in Table 2. There were no significant differences between the WSTP and EC groups. About two-thirds of the wheelchairs were rigid frame, about one-quarter were equipped with rear anti-tip devices, about two-thirds had armrests and almost half had air cushions. Table 2 Wheelchair Specifications at Baseline.Wheelchair Skills Test The total and subtotal WST scores for the participants who completed the study are shown in Table 3. At T1, the mean total WST scores were high. The subtotal WST scores were high for the Indoor and Community levels and lower for the Advanced level.As shown in Table 4, the T2-T1 change scores for the total and Advanced-level WST scores were significantly higher for the WSTP group than the EC group based on the t tests. There were no significant differences in the T3-T2 change scores. These findings were also found for the ITT analyses, regardless of whether the last observation was carried forward or the missing values were replaced with mean values. Table 4 Wheelchair Skills Test Change Scores.Individual skill success rates for the two groups are shown in Table 5. At T1 for both groups, there were 8 skills (7 of which were at the Advanced level) for which the success rates were ascends 15 cm curb and performs 30 s stationary wheelie ) in the WSTP group only. Table 5 Wheelchair Skills Test Individual Skill Success Rates. Picks object from floor Indoor 52 (98) 45 (96) 40 (100) 53 (100) 49 (100) 42 (100) 11. Relieves weight from buttocks Indoor 52 (98) 46 (98) 39 (98) 53 (100) 49 (100) 42 (100) 12. Transfers from wheelchair to bench and back Indoor 49 (93) 43 (92) 36 (90) 50 (94) 46 (94) 40 (95) 13. Rolls 100m Community 51 (96) 46 (98) 39 (98) 53 (100) 48 (98) 41 (98) 15. Avoids moving obstacles Community 53 (100) 47 (100) 40 (100) 53 (100) 48 (98) 41 (98) 16. Rolls 2m on soft surface Community 52 (98) 46 (98) 39 (98) 53 (100) 49 (100) 40 (95) 22. Gets over 15cm pot-hole Community 44 (83) 40 (85) 33 (83) 43 (81) 43 (88) 37 (88) 23. Gets over 2cm threshold Community 53 (100) 47 (100) 39 (98) 53 (100) 47 (96) 41 (98) 24. Ascends 5cm level change Community 43 (81) 42 (89) 36 (90) 47 (89) 44 (90) 40 (95) 25. Descends 5cm level change Community 47 (89) 43 (92) 38 (95) 50 (94) 44 (90) 40 (95) 26. Ascends 15cm curb Advanced 18 (34) e 26 (55) d 27 (68) e 27 (51) 28 (57) 25 (60) 27. Descends 15cm curb Advanced 35 (66) e 36 (77) 28 (70) e 39 (74) 37 (76) 30 (71) 28. Performs 30s stationary wheelie Advanced 29 (56) e 38 (81) d 29 (73) e 34 (64) 34 (69) 28 (67) 29. Gets from ground into wheelchair Advanced 17 (32) e 20 (43) 17 (43) e 26 (49) 27 (55) 23 (55) 31. Ascends stairs Advanced 11 (21) e 16 (34) 18 (45) e 13 (25) 17 (35) 20 (48) 32.At T1, the total and subscale CHART scores were high. There were no significant T2-T1 or T3-T2 differences in the CHART scores between the WSTP and EC groups based on the t tests or repeated-measures ANOVAs. Using the multivariate modeling for T2 vs.Participants’ Perceptions The participants in both the WSTP and EC groups generally reported their experiences as being beneficial. The WSTP group participants’ comments included that they appreciated being able to personalize their goals, that they would have never attempted trying some of the skills if they had not had someone to work with one-on-one and that they were able to participate in the comfort of their own environments.